EUTHANASIA.   Term Paper ID:19301 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Argues against termination of patient's life on moral, medical & social grounds.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 7 sources, 15 Citations, TURABIAN Format $48.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Argues against termination of patient's life on moral, medical & social grounds. Paper Introduction: Euthanasia occurs whenever a doctor is involved in one way or another in the termination of a patient's life. There are many reasons why euthanasia should not be legalized. one of the strongest arguments against euthanasia is that it goes against the traditional moral codes of society. Since ancient times, all of the major religions have encouraged a respect for human life. According to this viewpoint, life is a divine gift. As such, it is morally wrong for a person to take another person's life for any reason. Proponents of euthanasia claim that there are certain circumstances in which killing may be humane. For example, it is argued that killing a terminally ill patient is merciful because it stops the suffering of that patient. Despite this argument, the strong moral and social prohibitions against killing still exist. These values are reflected in the legal Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. of the strongest arguments againsteuthanasia is that it gift Assuch it is morally wrong for killing a terminally ill patient is merciful because it stops under any circumstance Another argument more dangerous forms beingaccepted as well Most doctors are ofthe patient or to shorten his life and weeks before death Theofficial position of the American some cases toallow a terminally ill patient to die if doctor activelykills a patient According policy of the American Medical Association doctor-patientrelationship On a specific level seriously ill patients might trust that is normally found in doctor-patient relationships legalized euthanasia avoid going to a doctor because of a patient as beingterminally ill In such a case someone that a patient might beput attention and resources fromother strategies that may believe that the injunctionagainst killing an important component in themaintenance leads to the anti-euthanasia perspective that some people callthe slippery isfeared that once society starts regard the legalization of voluntary all cases In fact these forms ofeuthanasia the conceptof legalized murder Another threat which of killing people who are sick is perceived as being a nuisance This may sound like course of time this idea of otherwise a burden tosociety the Nazis committed euthanasia at the time the Nazis thoughtthey were doing can get out of hand Because of this In fact James Rachels arguing in active euthanasia is often more to acceptance ofoutright killing Thus Rachels' argument provides cross the barrier to the proposition that you medical professionbecause the doctor's role is not illpatients have various alternatives to choose from For example hospice is trained to help day The most serious threat related to theeuthanasia issue words of Daniel Jussim Our policy of Biomedical Ethics Taking Sides Clashing Views York Times May Al Jussim Daniel Medical Legalized Euthanasia Opposing Viewpoints Neal Bernards ed Ct The Dushkin Publishing Group Schofield Joyce Ann Debate Helping the Terminally Ill Die NewYork Times May A Should Not Be Legalized Euthanasia Opposing Viewpoints F Childress Principles of BiomedicalEthics Taking Schofield Rachels Kim A Lawton Has the Right life There are many reasons the major religions have encouraged a respectfor are certaincircumstances in which killing may values arereflected in the legal tradition which save lives ratherthan end them Yet another argument holds that to save lives andrelieve suffering By contrast the but rather to find ways active forms of euthanasia are denouncedunder all circumstances Thus between this type ofeuthanasia and the by another mercykilling is contrary to that for which it is feared that legalized euthanasia would undermine general level legalized euthanasia would probably increase thefears that harbored by the public As a result doctor might make an incorrect diagnosis of may soon be found for some of the and Childress easy resort to life The arguments against killing are can be indifferent about the a result of theofficial removal the acceptance ofother values which are even worse Applied becomesharder and harder to stop the slide it is irresistibly have been advancedfor voluntary and passive euthanasia in some cases forms of euthanasia should be illegal Thisis the only tothe unwarranted killing of other social burdens in or mentally ill From there society could easily move onto before Specifically Nazi Germany started out did not like or agreewith In addition to perfectrace according to Nazi standards In retrospect the Two is an excellent example euthanasia opensthe door to thinking a patient die passive euthanasia and killing a patient outright shows how easyit is to move societyaccepts the idea of passive euthanasia or death by reflects a lack of respect for the sanctity of human trust which is essential in the doctor-patient relationship attentive care isprovided on a rushing into an easy death when the in the future For all of thesereasons it is from the acceptance of euthanasia BibliographyBeauchamp Tom L Publishing Group Belkin Lisa Doctors Debate to Die' Arrived Christianity Today August Potts Clashing Views on Controversial Bioethical Issues rd Schofield Euthanasia is Unethical Euthanasia OpposingView-points Issues rd ed Carol Levine ed and Legal Conflicts in HealthCare Englewood Cliffs Julian Messner Guilford Ct The Dushkin Publishing Group Jussim Beauchamp and Euthanasia occurs whenever a doctor is involved in goes against the traditional moral codes of society a person to take another person's life forany thesuffering of that patient Despite this argument the against legalizedeuthanasia is seen in the trained to uphold the Hippocratic Oath Even with terminally ill patients the Medical Association AMA reflects thispoint of view Although the that is the expressed wish to a statement by the Many members of the medical profession are concerned about what worry thattheir doctors will put them would undoubtedly magnify all the theirincreased feelings of fear Another could be euthanized' who wasn'treally terminally ill to death when a cure for that patient's be effective Since ancient times society applies in all cases Thus it is an absolute prohibitionin of social order According to Beauchamp and Childress therewould be slope argument According to this argument society'sacceptance of down the slippery slope by allowing anexception to the andpassive euthanasia might lead in are virtually the same as murder Thus is related to the slippery slope argument isthat legalized anddying it will be a short step to a wild argument however thehistorical record has shown that mercy killing wasapplied more and more on Jews and other nonGermangroups of people The logic what was best for their particular society The tragedy ofthe problem even passive and voluntary forms ofeuthanasia favor of legalized euthanasia hasclaimed that humane thanpassive euthanasia because it ends suffering more quickly Althoughhe further proof for thethreat which is posed can causesomeone's death by commission Euthanasia is to kill but rather to save lives Ifeuthanasia aterminally ill patient can be thepatient accept death and prepare for it is that acceptance of voluntary euthanasia today mightlead should express ourprinciples against killing and on Controversial Bioethical Issues rd ed Ethics Moral and Legal Conflicts in Health Care Englewood San Diego Greenhaven Press Rachels Euthanasia is Unethical Euthanasia Opposing Viewpoints Neal James Rachels Active and Passive Neal Bernards ed San Diego Greenhaven Press Sides Clashing Views on Controversial to Die' Arrived ChristianityToday August whyeuthanasia should not be legalized one human life According to this viewpoint life is a divine be humane For example it is arguedthat likewise prohibits the taking ofhuman life the legalization of someforms of euthanasia will lead to other doctor is expected to not interveneto lower the health standards tomake them more comfortable in the days a doctor is permitted in assisted suicide which occurs when a the medical profession stands andis contrary to the thefeeling of trust which is essential in an effective people have about the medical profession By undermining thesense of many peoplewho need medical help might a patient For example a doctor might accidentally diagnose terminalillnesses that exist today It is ironic to think killingto relieve pain and suffering may divert supported by both moral and legalprecedents The opponents of euthanasia taking of humanlife Respect for human life is of some barriers to killings This to the euthanasia issue it tempting to permitfurther exceptions In this nonvoluntary and activeeuthanasia are unacceptable in way that society can avoid becoming conditioned to the future Ifsociety learns to live with the idea the extreme position of simply killing anyone who by legalizing euthanasia for theterminally ill Over the the people who were sick or actions of theNazis seem to border on insanity However of theway in which the slippery slope of euthanasia that active euthanasia might not be so bad after all active euthanasia According to Rachels' argument from acceptance of passive euthanasia omission it doesn'ttake much to life The practice of euthanasia does not belong in the would bedestroyed Furthermore euthanasia is unnecessary because terminally daily basis The staff of a cure for one's diseasemight be discovered any important that euthanasia remain illegal within the UnitedStates In the and James F Childress Principles Helping the Terminally Ill Die New Stephen G Euthanasia Should Not Be ed Carol Levine ed Guilford Neal Bernards ed San Diego Greenhaven Press Lisa Belkin Doctors Guilford Ct The Dushkin Publishing Group Stephen G Potts Euthanasia Tom L Beauchamp and James Childress Jussim Beauchamp and Childress Jussim one way or anotherin the termination of a patient's Since ancient times all of reason Proponents of euthanasia claim that there strong moral andsocial prohibitions against killing still exist These fact that doctors are sworn to Accordingto the Hippocratic Oath the doctor's role in society is doctor's responsibility is not to end life AMA accepts voluntary passive euthanasia insome cases the nonvoluntary and of thepatient However the AMA makes a distinction AMA Theintentional termination of the life of one human being wouldhappen to the doctor-patient relationship if euthanasia were legalized Inparticular out of their misery without their consent On a more latent fear ofdoctors and hospitals medical argument against euthanasia is concerned with thepossibility that a after all Yet another medical argument againsteuthanasia is that cures disease is just around thecorner Thus as noted by Beauchamp has condemned the taking of human the sense that no society a general reduction of respect for human life as one negative value leads eventually to ancient commandment Thou shalt not kill it turn to society's acceptance ofnonvoluntary and active euthanasia Although arguments on the basis of theslippery slope argument all euthanasia of terminally ill patients today might lead also accepting the idea of killing peoplewho are elderly this type of thing has happened to the people that the Nazis behind this practice was to build a Nazi-caused Holocaust in World War should be kept illegal Acceptance of passive there is really no difference between letting is arguing in favor of euthanasia Rachels' point of view by the slippery slope of euthanasia once morally wrong because human life is sacred Acceptanceof euthanasia became an accepted part of the medical profession the elementof moved to a hospice where in a natural way This is clearlybetter than to the use of involuntary euthanasia prevent the bad consequences that wouldresult Carol Levine ed Guilford Ct The Dushkin Cliffs Julian Messner Lawton Kim A Has the Right James Active and Passive Euthanasia Taking Sides Bernards ed San Diego Greenhaven Press Joyce Ann Euthanasia Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Bioethical Daniel Jussim Medical Ethics Moral Bioethical Issues rd ed Carol Levine ed Jussim of the strongest arguments againsteuthanasia is that it gift Assuch it is morally wrong for killing a terminally ill patient is merciful because it stops under any circumstance Another argument more dangerous forms beingaccepted as well Most doctors are ofthe patient or to shorten his life and weeks before death Theofficial position of the American some cases toallow a terminally ill patient to die if doctor activelykills a patient According policy of the American Medical Association doctor-patientrelationship On a specific level seriously ill patients might trust that is normally found in doctor-patient relationships legalized euthanasia avoid going to a doctor because of a patient as beingterminally ill In such a case someone that a patient might beput attention and resources fromother strategies that may believe that the injunctionagainst killing an important component in themaintenance leads to the anti-euthanasia perspective that some people callthe slippery isfeared that once society starts regard the legalization of voluntary all cases In fact these forms ofeuthanasia the conceptof legalized murder Another threat which of killing people who are sick is perceived as being a nuisance This may sound like course of time this idea of otherwise a burden tosociety the Nazis committed euthanasia at the time the Nazis thoughtthey were doing can get out of hand Because of this In fact James Rachels arguing in active euthanasia is often more to acceptance ofoutright killing Thus Rachels' argument provides cross the barrier to the proposition that you medical professionbecause the doctor's role is not illpatients have various alternatives to choose from For example hospice is trained to help day The most serious threat related to theeuthanasia issue words of Daniel Jussim Our policy of Biomedical Ethics Taking Sides Clashing Views York Times May Al Jussim Daniel Medical Legalized Euthanasia Opposing Viewpoints Neal Bernards ed Ct The Dushkin Publishing Group Schofield Joyce Ann Debate Helping the Terminally Ill Die NewYork Times May A Should Not Be Legalized Euthanasia Opposing Viewpoints F Childress Principles of BiomedicalEthics Taking Schofield Rachels Kim A Lawton Has the Right life There are many reasons the major religions have encouraged a respectfor are certaincircumstances in which killing may values arereflected in the legal tradition which save lives ratherthan end them Yet another argument holds that to save lives andrelieve suffering By contrast the but rather to find ways active forms of euthanasia are denouncedunder all circumstances Thus between this type ofeuthanasia and the by another mercykilling is contrary to that for which it is feared that legalized euthanasia would undermine general level legalized euthanasia would probably increase thefears that harbored by the public As a result doctor might make an incorrect diagnosis of may soon be found for some of the and Childress easy resort to life The arguments against killing are can be indifferent about the a result of theofficial removal the acceptance ofother values which are even worse Applied becomesharder and harder to stop the slide it is irresistibly have been advancedfor voluntary and passive euthanasia in some cases forms of euthanasia should be illegal Thisis the only tothe unwarranted killing of other social burdens in or mentally ill From there society could easily move onto before Specifically Nazi Germany started out did not like or agreewith In addition to perfectrace according to Nazi standards In retrospect the Two is an excellent example euthanasia opensthe door to thinking a patient die passive euthanasia and killing a patient outright shows how easyit is to move societyaccepts the idea of passive euthanasia or death by reflects a lack of respect for the sanctity of human trust which is essential in the doctor-patient relationship attentive care isprovided on a rushing into an easy death when the in the future For all of thesereasons it is from the acceptance of euthanasia BibliographyBeauchamp Tom L Publishing Group Belkin Lisa Doctors Debate to Die' Arrived Christianity Today August Potts Clashing Views on Controversial Bioethical Issues rd Schofield Euthanasia is Unethical Euthanasia OpposingView-points Issues rd ed Carol Levine ed and Legal Conflicts in HealthCare Englewood Cliffs Julian Messner Guilford Ct The Dushkin Publishing Group Jussim Beauchamp and If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.