"BIG BUSINESS, STRONG STATE" (E.M. KIM).   Term Paper ID:26314 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Summary & review of work on causes & effects of South Korea's economic growth, 1960-1990.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 1 sources, 11 Citations, MLA Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Summary & review of work on causes & effects of South Korea's economic growth, 1960-1990. Paper Introduction: E. M. KIM'S BIG BUSINESS STRONG STATE This review essay summarizes and evaluates the above entitled book in which Korean author Kim discusses the factors which explain the remarkable economic growth of South Korea during the period 1960-1990. His central theses are that: (i) rapid economic development was successfully launched in the 60s by the authoritarian government of former General Park Chung Hee (Park) which through its centralized planning and controls over capital, credit and labor guided large industrial firms or chaebols into export-oriented industries in favorable international markets; (ii) in the 70s the South Korean economy made a successful transition from light manufacturing to heavy industry and continued to grow rapidly. The relationship between the Park regime and the chaebols became more symbiotic and Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. during the period His centraltheses are that i rapid economic or chaebols into export-oriented industries regime and the chaebols became more as pressures on the state from the chaebols for lessstate to suchchanging conditions to permit a but very difficult to replicate elsewhere The book that he recognize thevirtues of authoritarian rule in breaking the crony capitalism in the early s he per capita of a South Korean in World War II and the catastrophic effects of the a major cause of poverty and businesses were rewarded with credit which the state completely controlled his Economic Planning Board chose such industries because they utilizedSouth were available According to Kim economies of scale achieved by utilizing large businessgroups enabled countries in East Asia NICs until the mid s Theorganization In the s the Park regime pressed the chaebols to the hands of the Korean CIA Chunsucceeded accounted for over percent of manufacturing in South Koreaentails that the state reduce the scope expandingentrepreneurially abroad alone or in joint ventures the developmental state in the s While heavyindustry and later to high technology industries increased the size regimes with regard to labor a strong state and exportindustrialization strategies to develop their South Korea than it was enjoyed an unusualdegree of geopolitical importance to the United States many areas such asLatin America and very persuasive when he describes how the isable to lead businesses into is equivocal as to whethersuch repression was a necessary sine would have meant that economicdevelopment would have occurred or speed economic development in South Korea Kim is He mentions the corruptionwhich has in curbing In discussing South Korea's economic logical inference which he fails to draw and whichhas in to burst and economic growth to slow not only the fundamental factors delve into the possible weak links between liberal Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Economic above entitled book inwhich Korean author Kim discusses which through its centralized planning and controls over capital successful transition from light manufacturingto heavy industry and continued to of the SouthKorean state itself changed under its welfare spending grew Nevertheless the principal notidentical to those of other East soliddocumentation Its principal shortcomings are the author's timidity whenit comes forpolitical democracy and labor rights Also while he Summary The South Korean economic miracle can be the highest in theworld After enduring the in the s After his coup development Thegovernment combined a pervasive system of political repression with capitalinvestments in light labor-intensive manufacturing industries such astextiles clothing shoes foreign loan capital tofinance the development of such industries strong developmental state and bigbusiness groups in the worldmarket Wage levels Park in Industrialization in heavy industry high growth rates social unrest rose toward the late s political liberalization Therelationship between the government and leads Kim to make the point that the themselves with less assistance from the state They did not the wishes of the state interests the labor unionsincreased their demands on the state According to Kim labor exploded with discontent toward and lockouts rose from in to in Comparisons Other East unusually strong andthat among other differences the alliance between the FDI Kim cautions that the South Korean model of points out that the absenceof a powerful are notpermitted to control FDI as South Korea did in asometimes hesitant or risk averse suppression of the unions helpedlaunch the South clear whether more political freedom and democracyin the of the bookand come to any other conclusion but that with the evils associated with the growing wealth and politicalindependence theme of South Korean politicsand which only be forced to change and adapt tothe thatcorruption and crony capitalism lead governmental and business institutionalunderpinning of the South Korean the challenges theyfaced in their external environments He is not a defective crystal ball Works CitedKim E M KIM'S BIG BUSINESS STRONG STATE development was successfully launchedin the s by the in favorable international markets ii in the symbiotic and coequal theregime itself gradually losing legitimacy control over the economy and high rate of economic growth to continuewell into the s is an outstanding contribution to the literature of economicdevelopment cycle of economic andpolitical dependency in the initial stages of failed to foresee the emerging relationship between those phenomenaand was in Between and its average annualgrowth rate GNP Korean War South Korea's economic prospects in rampantcorruption and saw the establishment of an authoritarian after all banks were nationalized inOctober and Korea's principal asset a populous and relatively well-trained andeducated workforce two other factors helped speed development South Korea to jump-start its economy the statekept of labor unions was discouraged and severely repressed especially under invest in heavy industry suchas autos and shipbuilding in restoring order but he was forced GDP becamemore symbiotic with the government becoming more dependent and content of its involvement inthe economy The with foreignmultinational corporations many became more diversified as horizontalconglomerates capital called on the government to reduce its involvement inthe ofcompanies and therefore the mass aggregates of laborers South Korea haddeveloped one of the most militant labor movements economies Kim points outthat the say in Taiwan Taiwan was also less hostile than which led to a greatdeal of that international agencies such as the InternationalMonetary Fund pursue Park regime was ableto cut through red tape and certain sectors even when businesses arereluctant qua non for that development that it would have occurred at a slowerpace inconsistentin his treatment of this important point In the latter been associated with real estate prospects nearthe end of the book Kim expresses confidence that fact been borne out by experience in andeventually come to a standstill explaining it but also howthose institutions politicaland social movements and economic stagnation in earlier Development Albany State U of New York the factors which explain the remarkableeconomic growth of South Korea credit and labor guided large industrial firms grow rapidly The relationship betweenthe Park new military leader Chun Doo Hwan Chun political andeconomic institutions of South Korea adapted sufficiently well Asian societies which have achieved higheconomic growth rates to recognizing that his own logic requires diagnoses some of thepernicious effects of business corruption and summarized in a fewstatistics The average annual income cruelties of Japanese colonialism theravages of d'etat of May Parkargued that political instability was stepsto force-feed export-oriented economic development In Park's'comprehensive development state toys wigs and plywood Park's central planners and growing open internationalmarkets for their goods in South Korea helped bring about rapid economicdevelopment The in South Korea did not approach those in othernewly industrializing and chemicals in the s its endresulting finally in Park's death at the chaebols the five largest ofwhich by changefrom a comprehensive to a limited developmental state however act in lockstep Some obtained greater autonomy by Some chaebol CEOS even went into politics Transformation of during the s The shift to the end of the s Despiteone of the most repressive Asian NICs notably Japan Taiwan andSingapore have used successfully state and bigbusiness was much more striking in developmentmay be impossible to replicate elsewhere South Korea capitalist class in is not present in the early stages ofdevelopment Evaluation Kim is private sector He says the state Korean economic takeoff yet he initial phase of economic development authoritarian rule in the s atleast helped and power of the large chaebols Park with his draconian methods appeared to have made muchprogress processes of democratic consolidation and possible unification withNorth Korea The to economic excesses which in turncause the speculative bubble economic miracle of the past four decadesand explains perfect being a bit toounwilling to E M Big Business Strong State State This review essay summarizes and evaluates the authoritarian government of former General Park Chung Hee Park s theSouth Korean economy made a until finally Park wasassassinated in and iii the developmental nature from labor and others for more democracyand The South Korean experience is very similar but and is notable for its clarity of expression and its South Korea's economicdevelopment despite the negative implications of those findings South Korea's later economic difficulties per capita was percent one of appeared at best to beproblematical Economic Takeoff regime animportant first step in attaining economic other incentives They were encouraged to make Kim comments that in the s the alliance formed between the wages low to keep South Korean products competitive the repressive Yushin system introduced by and chemicals Even though the decade as awhole generated to move in the direction ofgreater economic and in on big businessfor political support This chaebols generally prospered and increasingly were able to fendfor and in a few cases simply defied economy but at the same time to protect its and their level ofeducation and training which facilitated unionization in Asia's history The number of strikes state in South Korea under Park regime was South Korea to foreign direct investment foreign aid and other support Also he lending policies under which recipient nations impose its developmental objectives on to do so Clearly the The keysentence is it is not It is difficult to accept the findings of the rest two chapters of the book Kim deals at considerablelength speculation and instances ofoutright bribery which has been a recurrent the institutions of thestrong state and big businesses will the mid to late s is Kim missed that point Conclusion This book delves into the changed dynamically in response to stages of economicgrowth and in having P during the period His centraltheses are that i rapid economic or chaebols into export-oriented industries regime and the chaebols became more as pressures on the state from the chaebols for lessstate to suchchanging conditions to permit a but very difficult to replicate elsewhere The book that he recognize thevirtues of authoritarian rule in breaking the crony capitalism in the early s he per capita of a South Korean in World War II and the catastrophic effects of the a major cause of poverty and businesses were rewarded with credit which the state completely controlled his Economic Planning Board chose such industries because they utilizedSouth were available According to Kim economies of scale achieved by utilizing large businessgroups enabled countries in East Asia NICs until the mid s Theorganization In the s the Park regime pressed the chaebols to the hands of the Korean CIA Chunsucceeded accounted for over percent of manufacturing in South Koreaentails that the state reduce the scope expandingentrepreneurially abroad alone or in joint ventures the developmental state in the s While heavyindustry and later to high technology industries increased the size regimes with regard to labor a strong state and exportindustrialization strategies to develop their South Korea than it was enjoyed an unusualdegree of geopolitical importance to the United States many areas such asLatin America and very persuasive when he describes how the isable to lead businesses into is equivocal as to whethersuch repression was a necessary sine would have meant that economicdevelopment would have occurred or speed economic development in South Korea Kim is He mentions the corruptionwhich has in curbing In discussing South Korea's economic logical inference which he fails to draw and whichhas in to burst and economic growth to slow not only the fundamental factors delve into the possible weak links between liberal Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Economic above entitled book inwhich Korean author Kim discusses which through its centralized planning and controls over capital successful transition from light manufacturingto heavy industry and continued to of the SouthKorean state itself changed under its welfare spending grew Nevertheless the principal notidentical to those of other East soliddocumentation Its principal shortcomings are the author's timidity whenit comes forpolitical democracy and labor rights Also while he Summary The South Korean economic miracle can be the highest in theworld After enduring the in the s After his coup development Thegovernment combined a pervasive system of political repression with capitalinvestments in light labor-intensive manufacturing industries such astextiles clothing shoes foreign loan capital tofinance the development of such industries strong developmental state and bigbusiness groups in the worldmarket Wage levels Park in Industrialization in heavy industry high growth rates social unrest rose toward the late s political liberalization Therelationship between the government and leads Kim to make the point that the themselves with less assistance from the state They did not the wishes of the state interests the labor unionsincreased their demands on the state According to Kim labor exploded with discontent toward and lockouts rose from in to in Comparisons Other East unusually strong andthat among other differences the alliance between the FDI Kim cautions that the South Korean model of points out that the absenceof a powerful are notpermitted to control FDI as South Korea did in asometimes hesitant or risk averse suppression of the unions helpedlaunch the South clear whether more political freedom and democracyin the of the bookand come to any other conclusion but that with the evils associated with the growing wealth and politicalindependence theme of South Korean politicsand which only be forced to change and adapt tothe thatcorruption and crony capitalism lead governmental and business institutionalunderpinning of the South Korean the challenges theyfaced in their external environments He is not a defective crystal ball Works CitedKim If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.