STUDENT LIFE IN LEGAL/MORAL CONTEXT.   Term Paper ID:26452 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Examines role of college in controlling student behavior, related legal decisions & philosophy, freedom & privacy, consent, morality.... More...

8 Pages / 1800 Words 5 sources, 27 Citations, TURABIAN Format $32.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Examines role of college in controlling student behavior, related legal decisions & philosophy, freedom & privacy, consent, morality. Paper Introduction: A current controversy spreading across college campuses is the nature and extent of a school’s control of the social life of its students. In the 1960s, universities ascribed to the view that, if they could go to war, at age 18, they were adults, and accordingly, the administration did not involve itself in the social and private lives of its students. Three decades later, however, universities have a new assessment of their part in regulating the social aspect of the campus culture. College administrators are now looking at their students as “quasi-adults” and are asking themselves, “What kinds of parents can we be?” In recent years, many college campuses have taken an in loco parentis approach in dealing with their students. For example, Lehigh University banned parties on campus unless a Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. if they could go to war at age they were assessment of their part in regulating an in loco parentis approach in dealing with their midnight after the first snowfall and at Harvard students live change its fraternity dominated social culture and individuals attending its school While some believe An analysis of the political opinions of J S should be assigned to individuality and how much with the rights of another and An application of Mill's maxims to the college social live their lives as they see fit If individual's conduct or otherwise finds individual's actions or associations According to Mill since society parents is to blame for the private existence In fact attempting to control the behavior Street Journal concurs with Mill's reasoning are people sitting on you trying to limit rounded adults Moreover restrictions on a university's social activities will significant point addressed by Mill is that simply because his pursuit This is simply the nature of admits no right either legal or moral in the permit namely fraud or treachery and force Gerald Dworkin takes nothing more than wagers by parents welcome Accordingly adults may like children lack the restrictions on their liberty as members concept of paternalistic interference to be under Dworkin's approach would seem restrictions of liberty aimed at that in cases of such legislation there beneficial consequences to be avoided or achieved and the probability must be adopted by society regardless of the would also have to consider any less protect public moral values In The Enforcement of Morals Devlin and common morality Subjugation of individual liberty is the the development of a safer more structured and dinners and other new gathering spots to give Hardwick U S further exemplifies the sharp whether the Constitution endows an individual with the in Judeao Christian morals and ethical human nature Thus the majority of the Court held moral laws which justify the engage in homosexual sodomy but accuses the Court of failing to recognize the should not be regulated by the state a paternalistic approach is desirable in situations involving a person's individual liberty may be restricted by the social lives of its students in left alone in his or has been raging for centuries and is at those who are not permitted a person a well rounded and there is no universal answer to particular controversy will continue to shift and change along with Taming of Animal House' N Animal House Defends College Fun Full Circle N Y Times March Id Id Goldberg Animal House Defends College Fun Wall St G Dworkin Paternalism The Monist pp v Hardwick U S Id Id of a school's control of the social life of its and private lives of its are asking themselves What kinds of parents can we ended a year tradition known as that it was abolishing all single-sex fraternities Dartmouth's trustees and issue is the extent to which a college a subtle method by which the morals of the administration of this legal and philosophical argument In his essay On individual is essentially free to do as be held accountable to society and private lives of its students activities Society cannot regulate activities duty to another society must age of majority if it has not managed to raise thus by the time they are they should be of the objective of regulating students' social lives author notes life is tough period of uncontrolled existence in force the students to go off campus society's interference For example a person pursuing a legitimate objective according to Mill this would not be only when means of success have been employed require restriction of their liberty Instead Dworkin parents focus on future oriented consent on what the child on the issue of consent and the extent to may act to safeguard our interests be far-reaching dangerous and irreversible a system of government that may act to safeguard protect against irrational dangerous and irreversible behavior Dworkin slightly softens authorities to demonstrate the exact of accomplishing the desired end of evidence to support its decision to maintains that an individual's liberty may be restricted not morals and ethics Society must be the stamping out of alcoholism would consider solutions such as alcohol-free adult of unsupervised parties and the selective Greek system The U a state's power to regulate homosexual in his concurring opinion noted that malignity than rape a heinous act the very Court's opinion is clearly based entirely different perspective Four justices agreed that the by civilized men the right maintained that private conduct between consenting adults reason for upholding a law regulating such private conduct The the morals of the country Thus like Devlin the Court's sexual acts between consenting adults would also paternalistic infliction of legal moralism as abhorrently invasive of its students' private lives to be has the right to restrict individual for them Inevitably such people will miss adulthood can be a powerful and dangerous Instead like the political winds that Rules Campuses Go Full Circle N Jersey Prentice Hall C Shields rev ed st of Law Fort Worth Harcourt Brace Bronner C Shields rev ed sted Id at Id at Id at Id F Shauer and Morals See Goldberg supra note see at A current controversy spreading across adults and accordingly the administration did not the social aspect of the campus culture College administrators students For example Lehigh University banned parties on campus unless in houses supervised by faculty members staff and must stamp out alcohol abuse The a school has a duty to act Mills Gerald Dworkin and Patrick Devlin as well as to society Mill answers this second if the person's actions dilemma suggests that a school does the conduct does not harm others society it to be distasteful Mill essentially postulates that churches schools has absolute control over an individual's life consequences In the college context many students of these newly formed adults in the context of college fraternities your behavior The author discusses pre-college parental control and not end the behavior deemed undesirable an individual's conduct may have detrimental impact any competition or contest Similarly in the Greek fraternity-sorority system disappointed competitors to immunity from a different approach to liberty than Mill In his essay that by curbing a child's liberty the child will ultimately capacity to make and implement rational decisions Therefore Dworkin argues of society People consent to a system of a type of insurance policy taken out by society to to suggest that students by accepting the school's invitation eliminating drugs sex and excessive drinking may be considered must be a heavy and clear of their occurrence He also believes that if expense or inconvenience Thus under Dworkin's theory intrusive alternatives Patrick Devlin is the most restrictive contends that in order to survive society requires a community price one must pay to be part system for the students' social interactions is students more social choice to be difference of opinion regarding society's interference with fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy The standards and that it has that a state does have the restriction of an individual's liberty even in rather the most comprehensive of rights distinction between the laws that protect public The fact that a government's majority finds a particular practice person's private life if the state to protect moral values Certainly a Court which order to maintain its moral standards In her private life One would surmise that the dissent in the heart of the current controversy on college campuses to act freely may spend their lives conforming complete individual On the other hand this question concerning the extent the rest of the political climate Bibliography Y Times February Mill J S On Wall St J New York The Slow taming of Animal House' N J New York February Id ff Emphasis added Id at Id Id at citing Bowers supra Blackmun J students In the s universities ascribed to the view that students Three decades later however universities have a new be In recent years many college campuses have taken the Nude Olympics in which sophomores ran naked at new president indicated that the school must begin to should interfere with the social and private lives of can be inflicted upon the individual students Liberty John Stuart Mill asks How much of human life he chooses so long as his actions do not interfere subject to social or legal punishment because individuals are free to simply because it dislikes the simply reserve its moral judgment of the its children as rational people than society alone fit to make their own choices concerning their social and A recent article in The Wall and during most of it there order to grow and develop properly into more well to do as they please Another cannot always avoid injuring another in a reason for interference by the school society which is contrary to the general interest to maintains that parental paternalism is will come to welcome rather than on what he does which all people must consent to limited in certain limited ways He considers his An analysis of the campus controversy their interests in certain limited ways Moreover his paternalistic view by requiring nature of the harmful effects or without restricting the individual's liberty then it restrict its students' social and personal lives and it only to prevent harm and offense but also to held together by the bonds of common thought the curbing of piggish behavior and supervised student centers bicycle trips pumpkin carvings S Supreme Court's decision in Bowers v activities between consenting adults The Court framed the issue as condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted mention of which is a disgrace to upon its interpretation of deeply rooted case was not about announcing a fundamental right to to be let alone The dissent that does not interfere with the rights of others Court in Bowers found that opinion in Bowers reflects the belief that a find that a university has the right to regulate the an individual's right to be an infringement of their liberty Bowers crystallizes the debate that liberty There is a danger that out on those vitally important experiences that make elixir The bottom line is that continuously influence society's philosophies laws and beliefs this Y Times March Goldberg The Slow ed Miller Chris The Frat Attack Follies-A Veteran of In Revolution of Rules Campuses Go at Id at Miller The Frat Attack Follies-A Veteran of W Sinnott-Armstrong The Philosophy of Law at citing also Bronner supra note Id at citing Bowers college campuses is the nature and extent involve itself in the social are now looking at their students as quasi-adults and a staff member or other adult was present Princeton University resident tutors Recently Dartmouth College announced crux of the problem presented by this in loco parentis others reject such a paternalistic approach as any law applicable this issue provides insight into both sides question by formulating two basic maxims First an are prejudicial to the interests of another the individual will not have the authority to regulate the social and has no business interfering with an individual's if an individual does not violate a specific until he or she reaches the have been under the absolute control of adult figures almost inevitably leads to rebellious conduct which is the antithesis Characterizing frat parties as harmless fun the post-college careers and family concluding that students need a by the administration it will only on another such injury alone is not enough to justify some people may not be invited to join However this kind of suffering and instead is to interfere Paternalism he rejects Mill's contention that only children of non-age recognize the wisdom of such restrictions In essence the that the focus should be government run by elected representatives with an understanding that they protect against people's irrational decisions which may to attend its institution also consented to the insurance policy Dworkin advocates to burden of proof on the there is an alternative means a university would be required to produce a high level of the three political thinkers analyzed herein Devlin of ideas including shared ideas on politics of society Certainly under Devlin's analysis within the scope of a school's authority Devlin appropriate alternative measures for a school to implement in place an individual's liberty The Court divided in its analysis of Court decided it did not Chief Justice Burger been considered an offense of deeper power to regulate homosexual activities between consenting adults The completely private situations The dissenting opinions reveal an and the right most valued sensibility and those that enforce private morality It to be immoral is not a sufficient individual engages in activity contrary to contends that the state has the right to regulate private contrast the dissent like Mill views such Bowers would find a school's regulation of that is the extent to which society to roles others have scripted unbridled freedom for those on the cusp of to which college administrators should curtail a young adult's liberty Bronner Ethan In Revolution of Liberty Upper Saddle River New February Shauer Frederick and Sinnott-Armstrong Walter The Philosophy Y Times February Id J S Mill On Liberty at Id Id Mill supra note at Id at citing P Devlin The Enforcement of dissenting Brennan Marshall Stevens J J joining Id at Id if they could go to war at age they were assessment of their part in regulating an in loco parentis approach in dealing with their midnight after the first snowfall and at Harvard students live change its fraternity dominated social culture and individuals attending its school While some believe An analysis of the political opinions of J S should be assigned to individuality and how much with the rights of another and An application of Mill's maxims to the college social live their lives as they see fit If individual's conduct or otherwise finds individual's actions or associations According to Mill since society parents is to blame for the private existence In fact attempting to control the behavior Street Journal concurs with Mill's reasoning are people sitting on you trying to limit rounded adults Moreover restrictions on a university's social activities will significant point addressed by Mill is that simply because his pursuit This is simply the nature of admits no right either legal or moral in the permit namely fraud or treachery and force Gerald Dworkin takes nothing more than wagers by parents welcome Accordingly adults may like children lack the restrictions on their liberty as members concept of paternalistic interference to be under Dworkin's approach would seem restrictions of liberty aimed at that in cases of such legislation there beneficial consequences to be avoided or achieved and the probability must be adopted by society regardless of the would also have to consider any less protect public moral values In The Enforcement of Morals Devlin and common morality Subjugation of individual liberty is the the development of a safer more structured and dinners and other new gathering spots to give Hardwick U S further exemplifies the sharp whether the Constitution endows an individual with the in Judeao Christian morals and ethical human nature Thus the majority of the Court held moral laws which justify the engage in homosexual sodomy but accuses the Court of failing to recognize the should not be regulated by the state a paternalistic approach is desirable in situations involving a person's individual liberty may be restricted by the social lives of its students in left alone in his or has been raging for centuries and is at those who are not permitted a person a well rounded and there is no universal answer to particular controversy will continue to shift and change along with Taming of Animal House' N Animal House Defends College Fun Full Circle N Y Times March Id Id Goldberg Animal House Defends College Fun Wall St G Dworkin Paternalism The Monist pp v Hardwick U S Id Id of a school's control of the social life of its and private lives of its are asking themselves What kinds of parents can we ended a year tradition known as that it was abolishing all single-sex fraternities Dartmouth's trustees and issue is the extent to which a college a subtle method by which the morals of the administration of this legal and philosophical argument In his essay On individual is essentially free to do as be held accountable to society and private lives of its students activities Society cannot regulate activities duty to another society must age of majority if it has not managed to raise thus by the time they are they should be of the objective of regulating students' social lives author notes life is tough period of uncontrolled existence in force the students to go off campus society's interference For example a person pursuing a legitimate objective according to Mill this would not be only when means of success have been employed require restriction of their liberty Instead Dworkin parents focus on future oriented consent on what the child on the issue of consent and the extent to may act to safeguard our interests be far-reaching dangerous and irreversible a system of government that may act to safeguard protect against irrational dangerous and irreversible behavior Dworkin slightly softens authorities to demonstrate the exact of accomplishing the desired end of evidence to support its decision to maintains that an individual's liberty may be restricted not morals and ethics Society must be the stamping out of alcoholism would consider solutions such as alcohol-free adult of unsupervised parties and the selective Greek system The U a state's power to regulate homosexual in his concurring opinion noted that malignity than rape a heinous act the very Court's opinion is clearly based entirely different perspective Four justices agreed that the by civilized men the right maintained that private conduct between consenting adults reason for upholding a law regulating such private conduct The the morals of the country Thus like Devlin the Court's sexual acts between consenting adults would also paternalistic infliction of legal moralism as abhorrently invasive of its students' private lives to be has the right to restrict individual for them Inevitably such people will miss adulthood can be a powerful and dangerous Instead like the political winds that Rules Campuses Go Full Circle N Jersey Prentice Hall C Shields rev ed st of Law Fort Worth Harcourt Brace Bronner C Shields rev ed sted Id at Id at Id at Id F Shauer and Morals See Goldberg supra note see at If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.