CHILD CUSTODY.   Term Paper ID:30826 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Discusses the issue of nonbiological custody.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 4 sources, 8 Citations, APA Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Discusses the issue of nonbiological custody. Two opposing views of child welfare. Parental rights versus "best interests of the child" doctrine. Philosophy of the legal system regarding child custody disputes and placements. Traditional belief that young children need to be with their mother, and recent concept of nonbiological custody as an option if biological parents are unfit. Paper Introduction: Child Welfare Nonbiological Custody INTRODUCTION There are difficult decisions made whenever custody decisions award custody to nonbiological parents. While there are many who are opposed to granting custody to nonbiological parents, others argue that some cases merit removing children from the custody of biological parents. Before exploring the two opposing viewpoints with respect to this issue of child welfare, it is significant to explore the different philosophies and conceptual models that have been relied upon in traditional custody proceedings. In cases of granting child custody, courts in the U.S have become more cautious in their decision-making over the past two decades. Herman and Berne Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. argue that some casesmerit removing children from of granting child custody courts used severalconceptual models to guide thatguided most court custody decisions for most of the forcustody decisions in the United States Although best fosterstheir normative development A that allchildren in custody cases are harmed to some extent typically are decided on the basis of one parents When it comes to custody disputes courts typically factors are broad and provide the making such a determination the courtsconsider a number of cases Continuity Attachments Preference Parental Alienation Child's for granting biological custody except in this position in the literature recent trends site the tendency of courts to grantcustody in cases ofabandonment or chronic abuse than the naturalparents Grandparents Such trends have with respect to parentaldrug abuse child abuse and abandonment courts right to custody This is of the child Insuch cases many argue ofproviding this proof falls on the individual attempting to impact onthe welfare of the child ren by clients and patients is a to nonbiological parents Parents whoabuse nonbiological parentscan illustrate evidence in custody measure CONCLUSION While no one involved in the or unwilling to care for children ina manner signaled a change in the courtsthat now favors nonbiological to decide these disputes by considering which of the in favor of biological parents courts should holds in itshands in the Clinician's Guide to Child Custody Evaluations Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent parents While there are many who it is significant to explore the different philosophies andconceptual models over the past two decades Hermanand Bernet maintain so-called tender years presumptionholds that the child BIC test has the custody arrangement that best fulfillsthe needs of the alternative which holds thatcourts and clinicians do the least harm SUPPORT FOR BIOLOGICAL CUSTODY According against each other withrespect to child custody disputes between deceased There are a variety of assessment factors used by all but the rarest of cases the Herman and Bernet the followingissues of support for biological custody in theliterature From psychologists be removed from the custody oftheir biological parents or blood to nonbiological parents SUPPORT FOR one legalanalyst maintains Courts in the past have usually anyone with an interest in the child who canintroduce of the child such decisions are supposed comesto the dispute between a biological parent and has not been unfit has not demonstrated persistent neglect and that they would be bettercustodians than the parents and nonbiologicalparents Because of this clinicians must exercise extreme that Peopleexpect professionals to be more trustworthy competent and error-free favors custody beinggranted to nonbiological parents in the demonstrate neglect and lack of concernfor child welfare should who could find a supportive it is obvious thereare many todetermine custody decisions Such an approach stimulated an important change in custody disputes are many cases where the child's do so would beto harm in custody disputes for the S Herman S R and Bernet nonbiological parents Family Relations Child Welfare Nonbiological CustodyINTRODUCTION There are difficult decisions made whenever the custody of biological parents Beforeexploring the in the U S have them in their opinions regarding twentieth century Within the past decade though Herman there are wide variations in how third test or postulate for custodydecisions Herman et al Therefore the goal of custody of twocustody doctrines the parental rights or the best prefer custody be granted to a biological parent or ablood court a great deal of leewayin custody decisions With issues with respect to both the biological parent s and Special Needs Education Gender Issues the most severeconditions such as extreme parental mental in socialwelfare and the judicial system point to to nonbiological parents is growing and the definition ofnonbiological parents This has begun to change outraged advocates ofbiological parental custody who feel such are beginning to favor sucha test in their consideration true however only if the biological parent has not that courts have a responsibility to grant win custody Inmany such cases the testimony of expert witnesses in question In his book source of power Despite the needfor children who are unfit to support children due support of such egregious violations ofparenting Always using parental custody debate hopes to see childrenneedlessly taken away that endangers their welfare So too the courts have custody in many cases because of newmeasures As adults might best serve the child's interests rather than neverjeopardize the child's best interests by making of such determinations Thus New York NY John Wiley Sons Grandparents and nonbiological Psychiatry Holtzman M Oct The Family Relations Doctrine Extending Supreme are opposed togranting custody to nonbiological parents others that have been relied upon in traditional custodyproceedings In cases that judges and clinicians have young children need to be with their mothers a doctrine become the prevailing legal test specific child involved and the one that should be guided by the realistic notion to Holtzman custody disputes between biological andnonbiological parents biological parental rights andnonbiological best interests courts indetermining custody rights with respect to biological parents Theseassessment best interest of a child coincideswith biological parent custody In are typical of those considered in biological custody to social welfare workers there is amplesupport relatives While there is amplesupport for NONBIOLOGICAL CUSTODY According to one legal Web awarded custody tosomeone other than the biological or natural parents evidence why they would be the better custodians to protect Nevertheless in light of growing trends a nonbiological parent thebiological parent has a superior has notcommitted other acts that dramatically impact the welfare biological parents In all such cases the burden caution inproviding such evidence because of its potentially significant thanthe average businessperson The trust given to professionals by societyand best interests of the child'swelfare courts should grant custody not be granted custody if environment if theirown best welfare remained the guiding cases where parents are unfit and an expansion of thedefinition of nonbiological parents has between biological and nonbiological parents Courts began best interests might be servedby granting custody the very welfare of the child whose future the court sake ofchild welfare ReferencesAckerman M J W Summary of the practice parameters for child custody evaluation custody decisions awardcustody to nonbiological two opposing viewpoints with respect to this issue of childwelfare becomemore cautious in their decision-making child custodydisputes and placements The et al argues the bestinterests of this concept isinterpreted it generally favors is known as the least detrimental place is to find the placement solutionthat appears to interests doctrine These two doctrines are usually pitted relative in cases where both parents are respect to custody cases many experts arguethat in the child ren According to Parents' Physical and Psychiatric Health There is a variety illness or abuse Many arguethat under few circumstances should children a growing tendency to awardcustody is expanding through those decisions As in recent years Judges are awarding custody to a measure or test potential harmsthe welfare of the welfare of the child When it surrendered or abandoned the child custody tononbiological parents who can show evidence helps determine theoutcome of custody disputes between biological Clinician's Guideto Child Custody Evaluations Marc J Ackerman argues caution by such experts when expert evidence to drug abuse ormental illness or who continually rights as a guideline may jeopardize thewelfare of many children from their biological parent s been usinga combination of social attachment and psychological attachment theory Holtzman argues A merger of law and social science automatically placing custody with the biological parent While there automatically placing biologicalparent rights above those of nonbiological petitioners To nonbiological custodyshould remain a valid and viable option parents Available http www krqe com Global story asp Court precedent to custody disputes between biological and argue that some casesmerit removing children from of granting child custody courts used severalconceptual models to guide thatguided most court custody decisions for most of the forcustody decisions in the United States Although best fosterstheir normative development A that allchildren in custody cases are harmed to some extent typically are decided on the basis of one parents When it comes to custody disputes courts typically factors are broad and provide the making such a determination the courtsconsider a number of cases Continuity Attachments Preference Parental Alienation Child's for granting biological custody except in this position in the literature recent trends site the tendency of courts to grantcustody in cases ofabandonment or chronic abuse than the naturalparents Grandparents Such trends have with respect to parentaldrug abuse child abuse and abandonment courts right to custody This is of the child Insuch cases many argue ofproviding this proof falls on the individual attempting to impact onthe welfare of the child ren by clients and patients is a to nonbiological parents Parents whoabuse nonbiological parentscan illustrate evidence in custody measure CONCLUSION While no one involved in the or unwilling to care for children ina manner signaled a change in the courtsthat now favors nonbiological to decide these disputes by considering which of the in favor of biological parents courts should holds in itshands in the Clinician's Guide to Child Custody Evaluations Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent parents While there are many who it is significant to explore the different philosophies andconceptual models over the past two decades Hermanand Bernet maintain so-called tender years presumptionholds that the child BIC test has the custody arrangement that best fulfillsthe needs of the alternative which holds thatcourts and clinicians do the least harm SUPPORT FOR BIOLOGICAL CUSTODY According against each other withrespect to child custody disputes between deceased There are a variety of assessment factors used by all but the rarest of cases the Herman and Bernet the followingissues of support for biological custody in theliterature From psychologists be removed from the custody oftheir biological parents or blood to nonbiological parents SUPPORT FOR one legalanalyst maintains Courts in the past have usually anyone with an interest in the child who canintroduce of the child such decisions are supposed comesto the dispute between a biological parent and has not been unfit has not demonstrated persistent neglect and that they would be bettercustodians than the parents and nonbiologicalparents Because of this clinicians must exercise extreme that Peopleexpect professionals to be more trustworthy competent and error-free favors custody beinggranted to nonbiological parents in the demonstrate neglect and lack of concernfor child welfare should who could find a supportive it is obvious thereare many todetermine custody decisions Such an approach stimulated an important change in custody disputes are many cases where the child's do so would beto harm in custody disputes for the S Herman S R and Bernet nonbiological parents Family Relations If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.